My Account |  Sign-in  |  Sign-up & Rates  |  Advertise  |  Feedback
Google
  Directory
News
Jobs
Docs & Videos
Travel Deals
Leads & Opportunities
CRM & eMarketing
Your Contacts
 
Search for News:
Keyword, Title, Summary, Tags:
News Category:
News Region:
News Type:
Services Menu
Front Page
This Week's News
This Month's News
News by Keywords
News By Category
News By Region
News
Put our News on your site
Monetize your web site

Subscribe To Newsletter(s)


Post News

BLOGS AND EVENTS
Retail Travel Training
Events
Selected News Posting
Email News Posting | Print News Posting | Post Comment

Aviation security mostly for show?

243 days 23 hours 4 minutes ago
By Bruce Schneier, author and technologist who specializes in security. His books include "Applied Cryptography," "Beyond Fear" and "Schneier on Security" and his other writing can be seen at http://www.schneier.com/

Related Link: NBTA Survey - Companies Will Not Significantly Reduce Business Travel Following Attempted Airliner Attack

(CNN) -- Last week's attempted terror attack on an airplane heading from Amsterdam to Detroit has given rise to a bunch of familiar questions.

How did the explosives get past security screening? What steps could be taken to avert similar attacks? Why wasn't there an air marshal on the flight? And, predictably, government officials have rushed to institute new safety measures to close holes in the system exposed by the incident.

Reviewing what happened is important, but a lot of the discussion is off-base, a reflection of the fundamentally wrong conception most people have of terrorism and how to combat it.

Terrorism is rare, far rarer than many people think. It's rare because very few people want to commit acts of terrorism, and executing a terrorist plot is much harder than television makes it appear.

The best defenses against terrorism are largely invisible: investigation, intelligence, and emergency response. But even these are less effective at keeping us safe than our social and political policies, both at home and abroad. However, our elected leaders don't think this way: They are far more likely to implement security theater against movie-plot threats.

A "movie-plot threat" is an overly specific attack scenario. Whether it's terrorists with crop dusters, terrorists contaminating the milk supply, or terrorists attacking the Olympics, specific stories affect our emotions more intensely than mere data does.

Stories are what we fear. It's not just hypothetical stories -- terrorists flying planes into buildings, terrorists with explosives strapped to their legs or with bombs in their shoes, and terrorists with guns and bombs waging a co-ordinated attack against a city are even scarier movie-plot threats because they actually happened.

"Security theater" refers to security measures that make people feel more secure without doing anything to actually improve their security. An example: the photo ID checks that have sprung up in office buildings. No one has ever explained why verifying that someone has a photo ID provides any actual security, but it looks like security to have a uniformed guard-for-hire looking at ID cards.

Read Full Story

Next article among the Most Popular

Posted By: Business Interactive Corp.
Email News Posting | Print News Posting | Post Comment
   
About Us   |   FAQ/Support   |   Partners   |   Disclaimer   |   Privacy   |   Contact Us

Tourism Exchange ©2006-2009 - Tools for small to medium sized businesses